Comments on: SEO Spam: Riding For a Fall?

By: Google and the Limits of Love « TecTrends Monitor

Google and the Limits of Love « TecTrends Monitor — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 03:41:09 +0000

[...] machine’s bandwidth, or mine. The search results are pretty good. They haven’t beaten SEO spam yet, but has [...]

By: Ian

Ian — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:32:56 +0000

SEO is a useful tool; but all tools must be designed to ‘fit the human hand’ so to speak. Having a totally automated SEO that always precisely pulls out the information you’ve asked for from the WWW isn’t likely to happen in the foreseeable future. People will be the ultimate SEO for generations to come, no matter how people wish it wasn’t so. Spam vs ‘filters’ will see-saw back and forth until a new form of communications technology makes the internet obsolete…

By: Brad

Brad — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 05:54:37 +0000

By: Patrick

Patrick — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:17:46 +0000

I should add that I have nothing against legitimate use of SEO, and more to the point nor do the search engines. It is a tool like any other. But SEO spam detracts from the value of their product, so they have an interest in flushing it out.

By: Amy

Amy — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:52:06 +0000

Nicely put that the tool has to fit the hand; that is what SEO spam promises without delivering. And yes, the spam v ‘filters’ struggle is an ongoing fact of life on the Internet.

By: Rick Robinson

Rick Robinson — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:32 +0000

By: Rick Robinson

Rick Robinson — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:06:26 +0000

Nicely put that the tool has to fit the hand; that is what SEO spam promises without delivering. And yes, the spam v ‘filters’ struggle is an ongoing fact of life on the Internet.

By: optimizareseoweb

optimizareseoweb — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:18:16 +0000

search engines such as Google Yahoo and Bing they are all looking for profit,profit is brought by the people using their services.If SE deliver crap information they will loose their clients, so profit.There will be always ways to delimiter SPAM from ethical.

By: Ferrell

Ferrell — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:12:41 +0000