<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TecTrends Monitor &#187; Farhad Manjoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tectrendsmonitor.com/tag/farhad-manjoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tectrendsmonitor.com</link>
	<description>Keeping You Ahead of the Curve</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 03:41:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Portability and Playing Around</title>
		<link>http://www.tectrendsmonitor.com/2010/01/14/portability-and-playing-around/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tectrendsmonitor.com/2010/01/14/portability-and-playing-around/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Robinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farhad Manjoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbooks and notebooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tectrendsmonitor.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farhad Manjoo of Slate is an insightful observer of the tech scene, but in writing about tablet computers a few days ago he made two odd statements.
A remark about &#8216;reading the New York Times online,&#8217; seems like a journalist&#8217;s rather wishful ideal of online reading habits. As I noted a couple of posts back, online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farhad Manjoo of Slate is an insightful observer of the tech scene, but in <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2241242/">writing about tablet computers</a> a few days ago he made two odd statements.</p>
<p>A remark about &#8216;reading the <em>New York Times</em> online,&#8217; seems like a journalist&#8217;s rather wishful ideal of online reading habits. As I noted a couple of posts back, <a href="http://www.tectrendsmonitor.com/2009/12/20/murdoch-versus-google-the-future-of-content/">online reading habits</a> (at least mine) <strong>do not show much brand loyalty,</strong> instead following links outward to other sites. If a site doesn&#8217;t have those outbound links, no problem: Google does.</p>
<p>And, says Manjoo, a decade ago &#8216;a computer was something you used at the office or for schoolwork, not to goof off.&#8217; But one of the first surprises I had when I went online in the mid 90s was that <strong>forum traffic was highest during working hours,</strong> lower in the evenings and on weekends. People might have gotten their computers as business tools, but were goofing off on them plenty.</p>
<p>Really what Manjoo is arguing is that <strong>the way we goof off on computers is changing</strong> &#8211; that with YouTube and ebooks, computer goofing-off is becoming more like TV, a couch potato activity. (The TV marketing euphemism is &#8216;lean-back.&#8217;) So who needs a keyboard or mouse?</p>
<p>The flip side argument is made by <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=116111">Kathy Sharp in OMMA</a>, <strong>writing about interactive TV ads.</strong> &#8216;Somehow it was always assumed,&#8217; she writes, &#8216;or perhaps just fervently prayed for, that the Internet would simply turn into a TV with keyboard.&#8217; Instead, as the wall sized screen gets an Internet connection, <strong>TV is becoming more like the Internet.</strong></p>
<p>What does this mean for the future of notebooks, netbooks, and other devices bigger than a smartphone and smaller than a full laptop? Portable devices are always going to pose a tradeoff between two different meanings of &#8216;handy&#8217; &#8211; <strong>easy to carry around versus easy to manipulate.</strong></p>
<p>The classic desktop and the smartphone mark the two endpoints. What goes in between is still being worked out, and will <strong>depend less on technology than on user habits and preferences.</strong> But I suspect that we will want to interact with our toys, big or small, more rather than less, and the most successful design innovations will reflect this.</p>
<p>Suffering from tech news overload? Let <strong><a href="http://tectrends.com/">TecTrends</a></strong> and <a href="http://www.tectrendsreporter.com/"><strong>TecTrends Reporters</strong></a> be your Sherpas as you climb the upper slopes. <strong>We read the tech press because you don&#8217;t have time.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tectrendsmonitor.com/2010/01/14/portability-and-playing-around/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

